0

Something does not have to exist in order for it to be discussed. There only needs to be a word or sign for it for a discussion to occur. For example…

0

It is confusing to me that I am able to know of something that does not arise in the universe and existing as such? Your asking me to understand something that falls outside of the universe somehow. Fiction itself exists in the universe however you want to define “things of fiction”.

I say that anything knowable exists in some manner.

Maybe we have to work out another word to use.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

0

Something does not have to exist in order for it to be discussed. There only needs to be a word or sign for it for a discussion to occur.

For example, in math, 0, ∞, √-1. In fiction, Winston Smith, Harry Potter, Golem. In mythology, Icarus, the Rainbow Serpent, Zeus. In religion, Amida Buddha, Susa-no-o-mikoto, Ahura Mazda.

All of these “things” do not exist. Language is a powerful tool. And language is also a great deceiver.

The difference between a sign and an existent thing needs to be clearly understood. An object motivates the concept, and in turn the concept motivates the signifier.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s